Mobile-Friendly Test
Free, no sign-up: enter a URL and we load the page as an Android phone and check the meta viewport, CSS media queries, fixed widths over 480 px, small text, small tap targets, horizontal-scroll risks and legacy plugins, next to an iPhone screenshot. The 0–100 score is a transparent sum of weights based on the page code, not Google’s verdict — Google retired its own Mobile-Friendly Test in December 2023.
How the score works
The sum of eight checks; without a meta viewport the verdict is always “likely not mobile-friendly”, whatever the sum.
85+ looks mobile-friendly; 60–84 has issues; below 60 is likely not mobile-friendly. Pop-ups and page weight are shown as hints and are not part of the sum. Website screenshot
Datos clave
Mobile-friendly test online: enter an address and get a 0–100 score from 8 checks (viewport, responsive styles, font size, tap targets and more), explanations and a screenshot. Free. It analyses HTML and CSS without running JavaScript; it is not Google's rendering.
- Precio
- Gratis
- Registro
- No necesario
- Procesamiento
- On our server: HTML is fetched with an Android phone user agent, JavaScript is not executed; the screenshot comes from thum.io
- Entrada
- One public URL (http/https); up to 6 same-site CSS files, 400 KB each
- Límites
- 10 checks a minute; 15 a day without an account, 45 with one, unlimited with Pro
- Resultado
- A 0–100 score from 8 checks with published weights, an explanation and examples for each, an iPhone screenshot, pop-up hints, page weight
- Última actualización
Free Mobile-Friendly Test
The tool loads your page the way an Android phone requests it and checks the code for the usual reasons a site is awkward on a smartphone: no meta viewport, no media queries, blocks wider than 480 px, small text, tiny buttons and links, wide tables and iframes, Flash and frames. Next to it you get a screenshot with iPhone emulation. The 0–100 score adds up eight checks with published weights. Google retired its own Mobile-Friendly Test in December 2023, so this is not Google’s verdict but a clear list of what to fix; for speed and Core Web Vitals use PageSpeed Insights.
Cómo usar
- Paste the page URL
- Click “Test page” and wait for the score and the screenshot
- Fix the issues using the hints and test the page again
FAQ
PromoPilot frente a alternativas: comparación
Comparamos solo lo que está confirmado en las páginas de cada servicio. Donde no pudimos confirmar un dato, la celda muestra "—".
| Parámetro | PromoPilot | PageSpeed Insights | Lighthouse (Chrome DevTools) | Bing Mobile Friendliness Test |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A score from 8 weighted checks | ✓ | — | — | — |
| Real-user data and Core Web Vitals | ✗ | ✓ | — | — |
| Notes | an iPhone-framed screenshot, pop-up hints, page weight | Google’s service: runs Lighthouse for mobile and desktop and shows real Chrome user data (Core Web Vitals) when available. | Built into Chrome: renders the page in phone emulation and audits accessibility, performance and SEO. The old Google Mobile-Friendly Test address now points here. | Bing Webmaster Tools’ test: enter a URL and see whether Bing considers the page mobile-friendly. |
Desplaza la tabla hacia los lados
Dónde somos más débiles: no JavaScript execution, real rendering or Core Web Vitals data; the score is heuristic.
Cuándo elegir PromoPilot: When you want a quick read without signing up: what exactly breaks on phones, how many points it costs and how to fix it — in plain English, Ukrainian, Russian or Polish, with an iPhone screenshot alongside.
Comprobado el: . "—" significa que no está confirmado en la página oficial; las condiciones y los precios cambian, así que consulta los sitios de cada servicio.